To herald the birth of this blogsite, allow
me to coin a new word, anapolethics. This anagram combines three words—analytics,
politics and ethics. In addition to Southeast Asia, which serves as my
empirical base for exploration, these are the main themes that run through the
short and long pieces that will come out of this blogsite.
Let me take neologism a step further. Anapolethics has two components. First, ana(po)lytics or ana(po)lytical which signifies the close entwining of the analytic and the political, as if to say the analytical is political. Second, polethics or polethical which presupposes the ethical dimension of things or acts within the political sphere, if one may grant autonomy to such a sphere.
Let me take neologism a step further. Anapolethics has two components. First, ana(po)lytics or ana(po)lytical which signifies the close entwining of the analytic and the political, as if to say the analytical is political. Second, polethics or polethical which presupposes the ethical dimension of things or acts within the political sphere, if one may grant autonomy to such a sphere.
The political nature of scholarship has
long been mooted and it has been the main stuff that fuels much of the poststructuralist,
postmodern and postcolonial criticisms. The notion of anapolytics as I use here builds upon,
but will endeavour not to rehearse, this long-standing tradition. What I aim to
examine and demonstrate in this blogsite is, among others, how in the micro-level the analytic
act may at the same time be a political act. Put differently, I wish to explore
the question how it becomes possible to imagine a space beyond the political
that the scholarly is supposed to inhabit. All this may sound inane and hifalutin; I will clarify in
due course the origins, full import, justifications and implications of this
question.
The politics-ethics nexus is also an age-old
question. The self-serving, dirty play for power that has long been associated
with real politik, however, has
hijacked the otherwise conceptually equal and neutral relationship, and has brought it to
the realm of negativity. Analytic (and I should admit, also political) imperatives
demand the re-imagining of this relationship back into its primordial—original—state.
As I will also clarify in due course, this is necessary to enable the shedding
of a number of analytic blinders that conceal the (sometimes insidious) relationship
between scholarship, politics and, ultimately, ethics.
In the anagram anapolethics, I deliberately
grant ethics the full name simply because I take it as the hinge around which
the other two ought to revolve. Whereas analysis and politics are a means, I
envision ethics as the end. One may argue that ultimately politics subsumes
ethics, for in final analysis, so the argument goes, it is the political that decides what
is ethical. I do not disagree, particularly from a purely analytic standpoint. From
a political standpoint, on the other hand, it is one’s subjectivity as analyst
that will decide, and I am one among those who elevate ethics as perhaps the highest (and sublime?)
form of the political. I recognize the attendant philosophical challenges
in this position, which I hope to elucidate and deal with in due time.
The above is more than enough to make this
blogsite unpalatable to many people. I recognize these high-flown pronouncements
might easily be misconstrued as no more than empty musings of someone who have
ample time to spare, which is not true, of course, given my workload. Too academic or pedantic or too philosophical, even pretentious, some
might say. One thing I can assure my reader, the target of the whole excise is of fundamental importance to our life as individual: its aim is primarily to contribute towards expanding the sphere of freedom--freedom held back by unlikely sources, which have to be exposed for what they are.
It will be largely academic in flavour, as it reflects what am I, but I will try my best to write in a manner accessible to broad intelligent audiences who may be interested in Southeast Asia, particularly the Philippines, Indonesia and to an extent Malaysia, in addition to those who are keen about the intricacies of knowledge politics and ethics of scholarly practice. Long before, I wanted to be a journalist, one who writes regular columns in opinion page of a widely circulated newspaper. That dream was aborted, about which I will tell more about later. After so much dilly-dallying, it is time, though this blogsite, that I try to approximate, if not re-live, that dream.
It will be largely academic in flavour, as it reflects what am I, but I will try my best to write in a manner accessible to broad intelligent audiences who may be interested in Southeast Asia, particularly the Philippines, Indonesia and to an extent Malaysia, in addition to those who are keen about the intricacies of knowledge politics and ethics of scholarly practice. Long before, I wanted to be a journalist, one who writes regular columns in opinion page of a widely circulated newspaper. That dream was aborted, about which I will tell more about later. After so much dilly-dallying, it is time, though this blogsite, that I try to approximate, if not re-live, that dream.
With great pleasure, I welcome you to my
imaginary world!
No comments:
Post a Comment